1964 Jaguar MK X vs. 2012 Ford F-250
To start off, 2012 Ford F-250 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Jaguar MK X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Jaguar MK X would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford F-250 (385 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 133 more horse power than 1964 Jaguar MK X. (252 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 1964 Jaguar MK X.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford F-250 (548 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 187 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Jaguar MK X. (361 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2012 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Jaguar MK X.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Jaguar MK X | 2012 Ford F-250 | |
Make | Jaguar | Ford |
Model | MK X | F-250 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3781 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 385 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 361 Nm | 548 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 6269 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 2029 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1966 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 3967 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 132 L |