1964 Jaguar Type S vs. 1983 Jaguar XJR
To start off, 1983 Jaguar XJR is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Jaguar Type S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Jaguar Type S would be higher. At 5,343 cc (12 cylinders), 1983 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Jaguar Type S weights approximately 726 kg more than 1983 Jaguar XJR.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Jaguar Type S | 1983 Jaguar XJR | |
| Make | Jaguar | Jaguar |
| Model | Type S | XJR |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 3442 cc | 5343 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1626 kg | 900 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1050 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2870 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 90 L |
