1964 Jeep CJ5 vs. 1973 Skoda 1202
To start off, 1973 Skoda 1202 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 2,197 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Jeep CJ5 (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1973 Skoda 1202. (45 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Jeep CJ5 should accelerate faster than 1973 Skoda 1202. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Skoda 1202 weights approximately 75 kg more than 1964 Jeep CJ5.
Because 1964 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1973 Skoda 1202. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Jeep CJ5 (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Skoda 1202. (85 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1964 Jeep CJ5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Skoda 1202.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Jeep CJ5 | 1973 Skoda 1202 | |
Make | Jeep | Skoda |
Model | CJ5 | 1202 |
Year Released | 1964 | 1973 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2197 cc | 1221 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 45 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 85 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1105 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1590 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2690 mm |