1964 Jeep CJ5 vs. 1974 Mazda RX-3
To start off, 1974 Mazda RX-3 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 2,197 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Mazda RX-3 (100 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1964 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1974 Mazda RX-3 should accelerate faster than 1964 Jeep CJ5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Jeep CJ5 weights approximately 180 kg more than 1974 Mazda RX-3.
Because 1964 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1974 Mazda RX-3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Jeep CJ5 (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Mazda RX-3. (135 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1964 Jeep CJ5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Mazda RX-3.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Jeep CJ5 | 1974 Mazda RX-3 | |
| Make | Jeep | Mazda |
| Model | CJ5 | RX-3 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1974 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2197 cc | 1962 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 135 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 850 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4090 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2320 mm |
