1964 Jeep CJ5 vs. 1982 Seat Ronda
To start off, 1982 Seat Ronda is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 2,197 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Seat Ronda (74 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1964 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Seat Ronda should accelerate faster than 1964 Jeep CJ5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Jeep CJ5 weights approximately 150 kg more than 1982 Seat Ronda.
Because 1964 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Seat Ronda. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Jeep CJ5 (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Seat Ronda. (113 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1964 Jeep CJ5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Seat Ronda.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Jeep CJ5 | 1982 Seat Ronda | |
Make | Jeep | Seat |
Model | CJ5 | Ronda |
Year Released | 1964 | 1982 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2197 cc | 1438 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 113 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4020 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2460 mm |