1964 Jeep CJ5 vs. 1997 Renault Helem
To start off, 1997 Renault Helem is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 2,975 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Renault Helem is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Renault Helem (510 HP) has 451 more horse power than 1964 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Renault Helem should accelerate faster than 1964 Jeep CJ5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Renault Helem weights approximately 620 kg more than 1964 Jeep CJ5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 Renault Helem. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Jeep CJ5 (145 Nm) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Renault Helem. (85 Nm). This means 1964 Jeep CJ5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Renault Helem.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Jeep CJ5 | 1997 Renault Helem | |
Make | Jeep | Renault |
Model | CJ5 | Helem |
Year Released | 1964 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2197 cc | 2975 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 510 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 85 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1650 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2680 mm |