1964 Jeep CJ5 vs. 1998 Peugeot 205
To start off, 1998 Peugeot 205 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 2,197 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Peugeot 205 (102 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1964 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Peugeot 205 should accelerate faster than 1964 Jeep CJ5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Jeep CJ5 weights approximately 240 kg more than 1998 Peugeot 205.
Because 1964 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Peugeot 205. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Jeep CJ5 (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Peugeot 205. (122 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 1964 Jeep CJ5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Peugeot 205.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Jeep CJ5 | 1998 Peugeot 205 | |
Make | Jeep | Peugeot |
Model | CJ5 | 205 |
Year Released | 1964 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2197 cc | 1293 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 102 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 122 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 790 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 3710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2430 mm |