1964 Jeep CJ5 vs. 2000 Lada 110
To start off, 2000 Lada 110 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 2,197 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Lada 110 weights approximately 40 kg more than 1964 Jeep CJ5.
Because 1964 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Lada 110. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Jeep CJ5 | 2000 Lada 110 | |
| Make | Jeep | Lada |
| Model | CJ5 | 110 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2197 cc | 1977 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1070 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2500 mm |
