1964 Jeep CJ5 vs. 2003 Pagani Zonda
To start off, 2003 Pagani Zonda is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 7,010 cc (12 cylinders), 2003 Pagani Zonda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Pagani Zonda (542 HP) has 483 more horse power than 1964 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Pagani Zonda should accelerate faster than 1964 Jeep CJ5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Pagani Zonda weights approximately 220 kg more than 1964 Jeep CJ5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Pagani Zonda. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Jeep CJ5 | 2003 Pagani Zonda | |
| Make | Jeep | Pagani |
| Model | CJ5 | Zonda |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2003 |
| Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2197 cc | 7010 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 542 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1250 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4395 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 2055 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1151 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2730 mm |
