1964 Jeep CJ5 vs. 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser
To start off, 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 2,982 cc, 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser (193 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 134 more horse power than 1964 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser should accelerate faster than 1964 Jeep CJ5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Jeep CJ5 weights approximately 86 kg more than 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser (280 Nm) has 135 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Jeep CJ5. (145 Nm). This means 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Jeep CJ5.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Jeep CJ5 | 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser | |
Make | Jeep | Toyota |
Model | CJ5 | Land Cruiser |
Year Released | 1964 | 2003 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2197 cc | 2982 cc |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 193 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 280 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 944 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2670 mm |