1964 Jeep CJ5 vs. 2005 Zastava 103
To start off, 2005 Zastava 103 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 2,197 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 59 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Jeep CJ5 weights approximately 110 kg more than 2005 Zastava 103.
Because 1964 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Zastava 103. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Jeep CJ5 (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Zastava 103. (88 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1964 Jeep CJ5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Zastava 103.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Jeep CJ5 | 2005 Zastava 103 | |
Make | Jeep | Zastava |
Model | CJ5 | 103 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2005 |
Engine Size | 2197 cc | 1242 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 59 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 88 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 920 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 3940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2510 mm |