1964 Jeep CJ5 vs. 2008 Acura CSX
To start off, 2008 Acura CSX is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 2,197 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Acura CSX (197 HP) has 138 more horse power than 1964 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Acura CSX should accelerate faster than 1964 Jeep CJ5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Acura CSX weights approximately 283 kg more than 1964 Jeep CJ5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Acura CSX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Jeep CJ5 | 2008 Acura CSX | |
Make | Jeep | Acura |
Model | CJ5 | CSX |
Year Released | 1964 | 2008 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2197 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 197 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1313 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4544 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1752 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1435 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2700 mm |