1964 Jeep CJ5 vs. 2008 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2008 Ford Ecosport is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 2,197 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Ford Ecosport (109 HP) has 50 more horse power than 1964 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1964 Jeep CJ5.
Because 1964 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Ford Ecosport. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Jeep CJ5 | 2008 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Jeep | Ford |
| Model | CJ5 | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2008 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2197 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 109 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2490 mm |
