1964 Jeep CJ5 vs. 2010 Peugeot 408
To start off, 2010 Peugeot 408 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 2,197 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Peugeot 408 (110 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 1964 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Peugeot 408 should accelerate faster than 1964 Jeep CJ5.
Because 1964 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Peugeot 408. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Peugeot 408 (147 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Jeep CJ5. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2010 Peugeot 408 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Jeep CJ5.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Jeep CJ5 | 2010 Peugeot 408 | |
Make | Jeep | Peugeot |
Model | CJ5 | 408 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2197 cc | 1587 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 110 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 147 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1815 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1525 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2710 mm |