1964 Jeep CJ5 vs. 2012 Fisker Karma
To start off, 2012 Fisker Karma is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Fisker Karma weights approximately 1510 kg more than 1964 Jeep CJ5.
Because 1964 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Fisker Karma. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Jeep CJ5 | 2012 Fisker Karma | |
| Make | Jeep | Fisker |
| Model | CJ5 | Karma |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2012 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Single Speed |
| Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 2540 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4996 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1984 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1331 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 3160 mm |
