1964 Jeep CJ5 vs. 2013 Nissan Juke
To start off, 2013 Nissan Juke is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 2,197 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Nissan Juke (185 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 126 more horse power than 1964 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Nissan Juke should accelerate faster than 1964 Jeep CJ5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Nissan Juke weights approximately 411 kg more than 1964 Jeep CJ5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Nissan Juke (240 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Jeep CJ5. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2013 Nissan Juke will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Jeep CJ5.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Jeep CJ5 | 2013 Nissan Juke | |
Make | Jeep | Nissan |
Model | CJ5 | Juke |
Year Released | 1964 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2197 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 185 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1441 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4125 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2530 mm |