1964 Jensen CV-8 vs. 2012 Holden Barina
To start off, 2012 Holden Barina is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Jensen CV-8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Jensen CV-8 would be higher. At 6,286 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Jensen CV-8 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1964 Jensen CV-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Jensen CV-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Holden Barina, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Jensen CV-8 (576 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 379 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Barina. (197 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1964 Jensen CV-8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Barina. 1964 Jensen CV-8 has automatic transmission and 2012 Holden Barina has manual transmission. 2012 Holden Barina will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1964 Jensen CV-8 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Jensen CV-8 | 2012 Holden Barina | |
| Make | Jensen | Holden |
| Model | CV-8 | Barina |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6286 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 330 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 576 Nm | 197 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1650 mm |
