1964 Lancia Flaminia vs. 1966 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1966 Lotus Elan is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Lancia Flaminia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Lancia Flaminia would be higher. At 2,458 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Lancia Flaminia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Lancia Flaminia (126 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1966 Lotus Elan. (104 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Lancia Flaminia should accelerate faster than 1966 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Lancia Flaminia weights approximately 824 kg more than 1966 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Lancia Flaminia | 1966 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Lancia | Lotus |
Model | Flaminia | Elan |
Year Released | 1964 | 1966 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2458 cc | 1558 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 126 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 696 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 3700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1180 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2240 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 45 L |