1964 Lancia Flaminia vs. 2006 Mitsubishi L 200
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi L 200 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Lancia Flaminia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Lancia Flaminia would be higher. At 2,477 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Mitsubishi L 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Lancia Flaminia (138 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2006 Mitsubishi L 200. (134 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Lancia Flaminia should accelerate faster than 2006 Mitsubishi L 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mitsubishi L 200 weights approximately 515 kg more than 1964 Lancia Flaminia.
Because 2006 Mitsubishi L 200 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Lancia Flaminia. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi L 200 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Lancia Flaminia | 2006 Mitsubishi L 200 | |
Make | Lancia | Mitsubishi |
Model | Flaminia | L 200 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2458 cc | 2477 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 134 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 17.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1305 kg | 1820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2970 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.1 L/100km | 8.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 75 L |