1964 Lancia Flaminia vs. 2009 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2009 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Lancia Flaminia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Lancia Flaminia would be higher. At 2,953 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda BT-50 (154 HP @ 3200 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1964 Lancia Flaminia. (138 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 1964 Lancia Flaminia.
Because 2009 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Lancia Flaminia. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda BT-50 (380 Nm @ 180 RPM) has 177 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Lancia Flaminia. (203 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda BT-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Lancia Flaminia.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Lancia Flaminia | 2009 Mazda BT-50 | |
Make | Lancia | Mazda |
Model | Flaminia | BT-50 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2458 cc | 2953 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 154 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Torque | 203 Nm | 380 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 180 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88.1 mm | 96.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 69.7 mm | 102 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 18.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 3010 mm |