1964 Lancia Fulvia vs. 2002 Mazda 626
To start off, 2002 Mazda 626 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Lancia Fulvia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Lancia Fulvia would be higher. At 1,840 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mazda 626 weights approximately 282 kg more than 1964 Lancia Fulvia.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Lancia Fulvia | 2002 Mazda 626 | |
| Make | Lancia | Mazda |
| Model | Fulvia | 626 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1242 cc | 1840 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 100 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1242 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2680 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 64 L |
