1964 Lotus Elan vs. 1958 Triumph TR3
To start off, 1964 Lotus Elan is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Triumph TR3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Triumph TR3 would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 1958 Triumph TR3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Lotus Elan (104 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1958 Triumph TR3. (94 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1958 Triumph TR3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Lotus Elan | 1958 Triumph TR3 | |
Make | Lotus | Triumph |
Model | Elan | TR3 |
Year Released | 1964 | 1958 |
Body Type | Convertible | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1558 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 94 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 3840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1400 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2240 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 29 L |