1964 Lotus Elan vs. 1966 Simca 1000
To start off, 1966 Simca 1000 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,558 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Lotus Elan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Lotus Elan (104 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1966 Simca 1000. (51 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1966 Simca 1000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Lotus Elan | 1966 Simca 1000 | |
| Make | Lotus | Simca |
| Model | Elan | 1000 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1966 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1558 cc | 944 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 51 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 3930 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1260 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2230 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 36 L |
