1964 Lotus Elan vs. 1968 Lotus Seven
To start off, 1968 Lotus Seven is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,597 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Lotus Seven is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Lotus Elan (104 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1968 Lotus Seven. (83 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1968 Lotus Seven.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Lotus Elan | 1968 Lotus Seven | |
| Make | Lotus | Lotus |
| Model | Elan | Seven |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1968 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Roadster |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1558 cc | 1597 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 3380 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1560 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 950 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2240 mm |
