1964 Lotus Elan vs. 1975 Seat 133
To start off, 1975 Seat 133 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,498 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Lotus Elan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Lotus Elan (100 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 1975 Seat 133. (34 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1975 Seat 133. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Seat 133 weights approximately 100 kg more than 1964 Lotus Elan.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Lotus Elan (138 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Seat 133. (55 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1964 Lotus Elan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Seat 133.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Lotus Elan | 1975 Seat 133 | |
Make | Lotus | Seat |
Model | Elan | 133 |
Year Released | 1964 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 843 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 34 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 138 Nm | 55 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 590 kg | 690 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 3460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2030 mm |