1964 Lotus Elan vs. 1986 Aston Martin Lagonda
To start off, 1986 Aston Martin Lagonda is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 5,340 cc (8 cylinders), 1986 Aston Martin Lagonda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Aston Martin Lagonda (309 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 205 more horse power than 1964 Lotus Elan. (104 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Aston Martin Lagonda should accelerate faster than 1964 Lotus Elan.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1986 Aston Martin Lagonda has automatic transmission and 1964 Lotus Elan has manual transmission. 1964 Lotus Elan will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1986 Aston Martin Lagonda will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Lotus Elan | 1986 Aston Martin Lagonda | |
Make | Lotus | Aston Martin |
Model | Elan | Lagonda |
Year Released | 1964 | 1986 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1558 cc | 5340 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 309 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 5290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2920 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 97 L |