1964 Lotus Elan vs. 1992 Toyota Land Cruiser
To start off, 1992 Toyota Land Cruiser is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 2,366 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Toyota Land Cruiser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Toyota Land Cruiser (108 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1964 Lotus Elan. (104 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Toyota Land Cruiser should accelerate faster than 1964 Lotus Elan.
Because 1992 Toyota Land Cruiser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Lotus Elan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Toyota Land Cruiser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Lotus Elan | 1992 Toyota Land Cruiser | |
Make | Lotus | Toyota |
Model | Elan | Land Cruiser |
Year Released | 1964 | 1992 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1558 cc | 2366 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1920 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2320 mm |