1964 Lotus Elan vs. 1998 Mazda 323
To start off, 1998 Mazda 323 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,839 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Mazda 323 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Mazda 323 (114 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1964 Lotus Elan. (104 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Mazda 323 should accelerate faster than 1964 Lotus Elan.
Because 1964 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Mazda 323, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1998 Mazda 323 has automatic transmission and 1964 Lotus Elan has manual transmission. 1964 Lotus Elan will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1998 Mazda 323 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Lotus Elan | 1998 Mazda 323 | |
Make | Lotus | Mazda |
Model | Elan | 323 |
Year Released | 1964 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1558 cc | 1839 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 4210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 55 L |