1964 Lotus Elan vs. 2000 Volkswagen Beetle
To start off, 2000 Volkswagen Beetle is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 2,324 cc, 2000 Volkswagen Beetle is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Volkswagen Beetle (167 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1964 Lotus Elan. (104 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Volkswagen Beetle should accelerate faster than 1964 Lotus Elan.
Because 1964 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Volkswagen Beetle, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Lotus Elan | 2000 Volkswagen Beetle | |
Make | Lotus | Volkswagen |
Model | Elan | Beetle |
Year Released | 1964 | 2000 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1558 cc | 2324 cc |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 167 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 4090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2590 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 55 L |