1964 Lotus Elan vs. 2001 Honda Z
To start off, 2001 Honda Z is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,558 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Lotus Elan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Lotus Elan (104 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 2001 Honda Z. (51 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 2001 Honda Z.
Because 2001 Honda Z is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Lotus Elan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Honda Z will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2001 Honda Z has automatic transmission and 1964 Lotus Elan has manual transmission. 1964 Lotus Elan will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Honda Z will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Lotus Elan | 2001 Honda Z | |
| Make | Lotus | Honda |
| Model | Elan | Z |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2001 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1558 cc | 656 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 51 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 3410 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1680 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2370 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 35 L |
