1964 Lotus Elan vs. 2001 Spyker C8
To start off, 2001 Spyker C8 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 3,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Spyker C8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Spyker C8 (400 HP) has 300 more horse power than 1964 Lotus Elan. (100 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Spyker C8 should accelerate faster than 1964 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Spyker C8 weights approximately 760 kg more than 1964 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Lotus Elan | 2001 Spyker C8 | |
Make | Lotus | Spyker |
Model | Elan | C8 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2001 |
Body Type | Convertible | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 3999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 400 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 590 kg | 1350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 100 L |