1964 Lotus Elan vs. 2002 Toyota RAV4
To start off, 2002 Toyota RAV4 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Toyota RAV4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Toyota RAV4 (145 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1964 Lotus Elan. (104 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Toyota RAV4 should accelerate faster than 1964 Lotus Elan.
Because 2002 Toyota RAV4 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Lotus Elan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Toyota RAV4 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Lotus Elan | 2002 Toyota RAV4 | |
Make | Lotus | Toyota |
Model | Elan | RAV4 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2002 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1558 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 145 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2500 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 57 L |