1964 Lotus Elan vs. 2002 Volvo V70
To start off, 2002 Volvo V70 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 2,524 cc (5 cylinders), 2002 Volvo V70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Volvo V70 (295 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 191 more horse power than 1964 Lotus Elan. (104 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Volvo V70 should accelerate faster than 1964 Lotus Elan.
Because 2002 Volvo V70 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Lotus Elan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Volvo V70 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Volvo V70 has automatic transmission and 1964 Lotus Elan has manual transmission. 1964 Lotus Elan will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Volvo V70 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Lotus Elan | 2002 Volvo V70 | |
| Make | Lotus | Volvo |
| Model | Elan | V70 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1558 cc | 2524 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 295 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 4720 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2800 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 70 L |
