1964 Lotus Elan vs. 2003 Lancia Zeta
To start off, 2003 Lancia Zeta is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,910 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Lancia Zeta is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Lancia Zeta (134 HP) has 30 more horse power than 1964 Lotus Elan. (104 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Lancia Zeta should accelerate faster than 1964 Lotus Elan.
Because 1964 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Lancia Zeta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Lancia Zeta has automatic transmission and 1964 Lotus Elan has manual transmission. 1964 Lotus Elan will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Lancia Zeta will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Lotus Elan | 2003 Lancia Zeta | |
Make | Lotus | Lancia |
Model | Elan | Zeta |
Year Released | 1964 | 2003 |
Body Type | Convertible | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1558 cc | 1910 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 134 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 80 L |