1964 Lotus Elan vs. 2003 Mercedes-Benz S
To start off, 2003 Mercedes-Benz S is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 4,266 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Mercedes-Benz S is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mercedes-Benz S (276 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 172 more horse power than 1964 Lotus Elan. (104 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mercedes-Benz S should accelerate faster than 1964 Lotus Elan.
Because 2003 Mercedes-Benz S is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Lotus Elan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mercedes-Benz S will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Mercedes-Benz S has automatic transmission and 1964 Lotus Elan has manual transmission. 1964 Lotus Elan will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Mercedes-Benz S will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Lotus Elan | 2003 Mercedes-Benz S | |
Make | Lotus | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Elan | S |
Year Released | 1964 | 2003 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1558 cc | 4266 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 276 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 5050 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 88 L |