1964 Lotus Elan vs. 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 2,343 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander (162 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1964 Lotus Elan. (100 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander should accelerate faster than 1964 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander weights approximately 880 kg more than 1964 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander (215 Nm) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Lotus Elan. (138 Nm). This means 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Lotus Elan.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Lotus Elan | 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
Make | Lotus | Mitsubishi |
Model | Elan | Outlander |
Year Released | 1964 | 2004 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 2343 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 162 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 138 Nm | 215 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72.7 mm | 100 mm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 590 kg | 1470 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 59 L |