1964 Lotus Elan vs. 2005 Renault Megane
To start off, 2005 Renault Megane is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Renault Megane (133 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1964 Lotus Elan. (104 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1964 Lotus Elan.
Because 1964 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Lotus Elan | 2005 Renault Megane | |
Make | Lotus | Renault |
Model | Elan | Megane |
Year Released | 1964 | 2005 |
Body Type | Convertible | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1558 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 133 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 60 L |