1964 Lotus Elan vs. 2006 Toyota Camry
To start off, 2006 Toyota Camry is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 2,999 cc, 2006 Toyota Camry is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota Camry (190 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 1964 Lotus Elan. (104 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Camry should accelerate faster than 1964 Lotus Elan.
Because 1964 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Camry, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Lotus Elan | 2006 Toyota Camry | |
| Make | Lotus | Toyota |
| Model | Elan | Camry |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1558 cc | 2999 cc |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 190 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 4810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2730 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 70 L |
