1964 Lotus Elan vs. 2010 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2010 Holden Colorado is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Holden Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Colorado (123 HP) has 19 more horse power than 1964 Lotus Elan. (104 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Colorado should accelerate faster than 1964 Lotus Elan.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Lotus Elan | 2010 Holden Colorado | |
Make | Lotus | Holden |
Model | Elan | Colorado |
Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1558 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 123 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |