1964 Lotus Elan vs. 2010 Hyundai i10
To start off, 2010 Hyundai i10 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,558 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Lotus Elan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Lotus Elan (104 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 2010 Hyundai i10. (66 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 2010 Hyundai i10.
Because 1964 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Hyundai i10, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Lotus Elan | 2010 Hyundai i10 | |
| Make | Lotus | Hyundai |
| Model | Elan | i10 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1558 cc | 1086 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 66 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 3570 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2390 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 35 L |
