1964 Lotus Elan vs. 2010 Mercedes-Benz B
To start off, 2010 Mercedes-Benz B is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,989 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mercedes-Benz B is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mercedes-Benz B (138 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1964 Lotus Elan. (104 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mercedes-Benz B should accelerate faster than 1964 Lotus Elan.
Because 1964 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mercedes-Benz B, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Lotus Elan | 2010 Mercedes-Benz B | |
| Make | Lotus | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Elan | B |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1558 cc | 1989 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 138 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1610 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2780 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 54 L |
