1964 Lotus Elan vs. 2013 BMW X6 M
To start off, 2013 BMW X6 M is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 4,395 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 BMW X6 M is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 BMW X6 M (547 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 443 more horse power than 1964 Lotus Elan. (104 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 BMW X6 M should accelerate faster than 1964 Lotus Elan.
Because 2013 BMW X6 M is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Lotus Elan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 BMW X6 M will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 BMW X6 M has automatic transmission and 1964 Lotus Elan has manual transmission. 1964 Lotus Elan will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 BMW X6 M will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Lotus Elan | 2013 BMW X6 M | |
| Make | Lotus | BMW |
| Model | Elan | X6 M |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1558 cc | 4395 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 547 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 4876 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 2195 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1684 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2933 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 85 L |
