1964 Lotus Elan vs. 2013 Dodge CHARGER
To start off, 2013 Dodge CHARGER is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Dodge CHARGER is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Dodge CHARGER (288 HP @ 6350 RPM) has 184 more horse power than 1964 Lotus Elan. (104 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Dodge CHARGER should accelerate faster than 1964 Lotus Elan.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 Dodge CHARGER has automatic transmission and 1964 Lotus Elan has manual transmission. 1964 Lotus Elan will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Dodge CHARGER will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Lotus Elan | 2013 Dodge CHARGER | |
Make | Lotus | Dodge |
Model | Elan | CHARGER |
Year Released | 1964 | 2013 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1558 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 288 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 6350 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 8-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 5077 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1905 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1482 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 3052 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 72 L |