1964 Lotus Seven vs. 1998 Rover 200

To start off, 1998 Rover 200 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 1,396 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Rover 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Rover 200 (102 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1964 Lotus Seven. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Rover 200 should accelerate faster than 1964 Lotus Seven. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Rover 200 weights approximately 598 kg more than 1964 Lotus Seven. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1964 Lotus Seven is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Lotus Seven. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Rover 200, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1964 Lotus Seven 1998 Rover 200
Make Lotus Rover
Model Seven 200
Year Released 1964 1998
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 997 cc 1396 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 38 HP 102 HP
Engine RPM 5000 RPM 6000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 432 kg 1030 kg
Vehicle Length 3360 mm 3980 mm
Vehicle Width 1490 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1100 mm 1430 mm
Wheelbase Size 2240 mm 2510 mm