1964 Lotus Seven vs. 2000 Lotus M250
To start off, 2000 Lotus M250 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Lotus M250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lotus M250 (176 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 138 more horse power than 1964 Lotus Seven. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lotus M250 should accelerate faster than 1964 Lotus Seven. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Lotus M250 weights approximately 243 kg more than 1964 Lotus Seven. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Lotus Seven | 2000 Lotus M250 | |
| Make | Lotus | Lotus |
| Model | Seven | M250 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 997 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 38 HP | 176 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 7800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 432 kg | 675 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3360 mm | 4150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1100 mm | 1120 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2520 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 72 L |
