1964 Lotus Seven vs. 2001 Mitsubishi Pajero
To start off, 2001 Mitsubishi Pajero is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Mitsubishi Pajero is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Mitsubishi Pajero (128 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 1964 Lotus Seven. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Mitsubishi Pajero should accelerate faster than 1964 Lotus Seven. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mitsubishi Pajero weights approximately 868 kg more than 1964 Lotus Seven. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2001 Mitsubishi Pajero is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Lotus Seven. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mitsubishi Pajero will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Lotus Seven | 2001 Mitsubishi Pajero | |
| Make | Lotus | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Seven | Pajero |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2001 |
| Body Type | Roadster | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 997 cc | 1999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 38 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 432 kg | 1300 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3360 mm | 4040 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1100 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2460 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 53 L |
