1964 Lotus Seven vs. 2003 Renault Megane
To start off, 2003 Renault Megane is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Renault Megane (114 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 1964 Lotus Seven. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1964 Lotus Seven.
Because 1964 Lotus Seven is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Lotus Seven. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Lotus Seven | 2003 Renault Megane | |
Make | Lotus | Renault |
Model | Seven | Megane |
Year Released | 1964 | 2003 |
Body Type | Roadster | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 997 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3360 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1100 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2690 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 60 L |