1964 Lotus Seven vs. 2005 Mazda 6
To start off, 2005 Mazda 6 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda 6 (220 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 182 more horse power than 1964 Lotus Seven. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1964 Lotus Seven. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda 6 weights approximately 1138 kg more than 1964 Lotus Seven. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Lotus Seven is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Lotus Seven. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Lotus Seven | 2005 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Lotus | Mazda |
Model | Seven | 6 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2005 |
Body Type | Roadster | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 997 cc | 2966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 220 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 432 kg | 1570 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3360 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1100 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 68 L |