1964 Marcos 1800 vs. 2005 Toyota Highlander
To start off, 2005 Toyota Highlander is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Marcos 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Marcos 1800 would be higher. At 3,309 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Toyota Highlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota Highlander (230 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 116 more horse power than 1964 Marcos 1800. (114 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Highlander should accelerate faster than 1964 Marcos 1800. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota Highlander weights approximately 907 kg more than 1964 Marcos 1800. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota Highlander (314 Nm) has 165 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Marcos 1800. (149 Nm). This means 2005 Toyota Highlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Marcos 1800.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Marcos 1800 | 2005 Toyota Highlander | |
Make | Marcos | Toyota |
Model | 1800 | Highlander |
Year Released | 1964 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1783 cc | 3309 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 230 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 149 Nm | 314 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84.1 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.8:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 774 kg | 1681 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4080 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1060 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2280 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 73 L |