1964 Marcos 1800 vs. 2012 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2012 Holden Cruze is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Marcos 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Marcos 1800 would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Holden Cruze is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Cruze (161 HP) has 47 more horse power than 1964 Marcos 1800. (114 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 1964 Marcos 1800.
Because 1964 Marcos 1800 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Marcos 1800. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Cruze (360 Nm) has 211 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Marcos 1800. (149 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Cruze will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Marcos 1800.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Marcos 1800 | 2012 Holden Cruze | |
Make | Marcos | Holden |
Model | 1800 | Cruze |
Year Released | 1964 | 2012 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1783 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 161 HP |
Torque | 149 Nm | 360 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4080 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1788 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1060 mm | 1477 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2280 mm | 2685 mm |